An online petition has been started calling for the Chief Rabbi to stay on beyond his scheduled retirement date. Lord Sacks is planning to move on after 21 years in office in September 2013, six months after his 65th birthday.
The prospect of him postponing his departure seems unlikely. His close associates had long indicated he was minded to step down at 65. If he had wanted to remain for a couple of years or, like his predecessor Lord Jakobovits, until he was 70, the United Synagogue would surely not have turned down the offer.
He will be able to continue doing what he does best, writing, speaking and broadcasting, regardless of whether he holds the title of Chief Rabbi or not: there seems no reason, for instance, why he would have to give up his Thought for the Day slot when he leaves office. His seat in the Lords will also guarantee him a national platform. In demand as a speaker internationally, he will be free to pursue engagements abroad without having to worry about ceremonial appearances or functional duties back home.
Conceivably, he could be asked to stay on for a few months after September pending a handover. But if it he were asked to delay his retirement for substantially longer, it would risk looking like an admission from the United Synagogue that it could find no one worthy to take on the role: unless perhaps it had identified an heir apparent who needed a few more years to mature.
Source: http://www.thejc.com/blogs/simon-rocker/should-chief-rabbi-stay
The Ashes European banks Short breaks The far right St Lucia Sunderland
No comments:
Post a Comment